Even if the dialogue is just not of the (demi-)god but of transgressive saints, as in Hudson 1989 (cited under Bhakti), the theological challenge posed continues to be that exemplified by this legal god par excellence. This anthology was at first meant to resituate divergent theoretical methods to this conversion https://griffinjmljj.blogs-service.com/60911181/bhairav-can-be-fun-for-anyone